Humanitarian intervention is one of the most controversial issues in international law. At the point of humanitarian intervention, the discussions on the lawfulness of the use of force constitute the basis of "Prohibition to Use Force" and "Don't Interfere with Internal Affairs". As a result of changing world order and cyclical shifts, the need for raw materials and internal conflicts in underdeveloped countries make the implications of the great forces even more debatable. It is also evident that the political elements of the economy are positioned in the same ministry together with the protection of the individual. This study represents a Libyan-specific research on the fact that the UN and NATO, in particular in the framework of international legal norms, which countries have jointly accepted and applied, have or have not implemented, in particular directly or indirectly, "humanitarian" intervention in the underdeveloped regions. The sanctions, political and diplomatic initiatives and contacts and actions at the military point before the intervention are at the top of the study. The intervention of the NATO with UNSC Resolution, which is considered as the closest example of human intervention in our history, especially at the point of intervention, has been examined comparing Libya's intervention with the previous interventions, including its in-depth and historical background. |